the issue that mentioned in the article is quite common in today's architecture. But
their one thing that shocked me is this issue were appeared in Europen. In my point
of view, it is reasonable to find this kind of apartment in developing countries, but not
in European. Especially Spain, the country with hundreds of remakable buildings such
as the The Royal Palace in Madrid, Batllo apartment, Goel Park et cetera.
Compare with other famous buildings in Spain, the apartment that in this blog were
considered as inappropriate, irresponsible and lack of consideration. It ture that the form
of this building is simple ,clear and shows a sence of beautiful, just as Steven said: In a
long tradition of squeezing beautifully resolved plans into minimum area.
However, when you look closely at this apartment's plan, the repeatation of the residence
and some rotation to fit in the form. Expecially the samll balcony which is way to narrow
when you compare with the statement in Residential Flat Design Code. The ventilation for
this apartment was reluctantly feasible, but the solar control and consideration were
insufficient.
In conclusion,a good apartment should not only focus on the aecthetic form, sustainability
material and the environmental consideraion, such as lighting, acousics and ventilation.
The following link shows another kind of flat design code but much more specific. In my
point of view, architect should design the apartment follow the building code sometimes
even considered more than it.
http://apps.actpla.act.gov.au/tplan/planning_register/register_docs/apartments.pdf